By Kate McGee, The Texas Tribune
Students and faculty at Texas A&M University’s Qatar branch are slamming the Texas A&M University System Board of Regents’ abrupt decision last week to wind down the Doha campus after more than two decades.
At a Texas A&M faculty senate meeting Monday, several professors from Qatar called for more answers and a clear transition plan for staff and students there, many of whom they say are devastated by the decision.
“Our students can’t understand how local Texan politics can unilaterally determine a weighty decision about a very successful campus that excels in education without any discussion or negotiation,” Brittany Bounds, a history professor at the Qatar campus, said at the meeting.
She noted the move is especially confusing to the campus community since the school renewed its contract with the state-run Qatar Foundation in 2021, extending the teaching agreement for another 10 years.
Regents voted 7-1 Thursday to cut the contract without any public discussion. Board Chair Bill Mahomes declined an interview request and the board member who introduced the resolution, Mike Hernandez, did not respond to a request for comment. The university system pledged to continue teaching current students at the school until the campus officially closes in 2028.
Khalid Al-Sada, student government president and a senior majoring in chemical engineering at the Qatar campus, said students’ initial shock and disappointment in the decision has turned to fear, panic and anger as reality sets in. They are worried about how the decision will impact graduate students who were expecting to graduate after 2028, how it will deteriorate the college experience for freshmen as the campus winds down during their four-year programs and whether the value of their degrees will remain after the school closes its doors.
“We were all just left wondering what is going to happen to the dreams, the hopes we had, our hopes, what we wanted to achieve with all the different studying and all of that,” Al-Sada told The Texas Tribune. “We still have so many questions and we don’t have many answers to any of them, to be honest.”
Al-Sada said he was playing video games with friends late Thursday when he got a call from a friend alerting him the board had voted to cancel the contract. He was planning to apply for graduate school at the Qatar campus next year. The university is one of the only options for graduate engineering degrees in Qatar, he said.
“Overnight our future has been placed in such a volatile position,” he said.
In a press release sent after the Thursday vote, the system said the board decided to reevaluate the university’s presence in Qatar this fall “due to the heightened instability in the Middle East.”
“The Board has decided that the core mission of Texas A&M should be advanced primarily within Texas and the United States,” Board of Regents Chair Bill Mahomes said. “By the middle of the 21st century, the university will not necessarily need a campus infrastructure 8,000 miles away to support education and research collaborations.”
The university opened the Qatar campus in 2003 to boost engineering education and research in the Middle East, a major oil and gas region. Qatar is also a major American ally and home to a United States Air Force base in Doha. More than 1,500 students have graduated from the program and it currently enrolls 730 students, according to the university. All campus operations are paid for by the Qatar Foundation, which is controlled by the country’s government. A&M is a public institution and no state funding or tuition revenue can be used to pay for the campus’ operations.
Texas A&M is one of six American universities that has a location in Doha’s Education City, including Virginia Commonwealth University, Georgetown University and Northwestern University. The University of London ended its contract with the Qatar Foundation in 2020 as part of changes it made to its academic priorities.
Administrators told faculty on Monday that they alerted the Qatar Foundation a month prior that regents would discuss the contract at their Feb. 8 meeting. But faculty told the Tribune they did not expect the board to cancel the contract and were caught off guard by the decision.
“We assumed that it was a conversation that needed to be seen publicly, but we had no idea that the regents would actually vote to close this campus,” Bounds said. “Waking up to a flurry of messages and emails on Friday morning was disorienting; I felt kicked in the gut.”
Texas A&M President Mark Welsh III held a town hall meeting Sunday morning to answer pre-submitted questions from faculty and students about the board’s decision. He said A&M officials would be visiting the Doha campus to discuss a transition plan.
A transcript of the meeting provided by Texas A&M shows university leaders had few details to share about the transition plan, saying they were still determining what the decision means for ongoing research projects and faculty appointments.
Professor Mohammed Al-Hashimi described the town hall as a “one-way broadcast” rather than a real dialogue.
“Attendees found themselves unable to voice their concerns or provide feedback, effectively resulting in a sense of this continued disconnection and frustration,” he told A&M faculty during Monday’s meeting.
Al-Sada said the town hall exacerbated frustrations among the student body, too. The lack of clear answers and limited details about a transition plan only emphasized to students that the decision to end the contract appeared to be rushed.
Faculty members who spoke to the Tribune said communication from Texas and Qatar administrators has been sparse since the board vote, and that some faculty were reprimanded for attempting to hold group listening sessions for Sunday’s town hall.
One faculty member in Qatar who spoke to the Tribune on the condition of anonymity because of fears of retaliation said faculty watching the town hall in Qatar were laughing at the lack of specifics by the end of the meeting.
N.K. Anand, vice provost of faculty affairs, told faculty that administrators met with the president of the Qatar Foundation on Monday. Anand said he will travel to Qatar in early March to meet with faculty, staff and students there to hear their concerns. A full transition team will travel to the campus in May, he said.
Anand confirmed the school will not admit freshmen in the fall, stating the Qatar Foundation will decide where freshman applicants will attend school instead.
Bounds and other faculty said they are also not convinced by the regents’ reasoning to close the campus because of heightened instability in the Middle East amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. The professors argued instability in the region was never an issue before. Similar skepticism was also expressed by the Qatar Foundation, which accused the university in a statement last week of falling victim to a “disinformation campaign aimed at harming the interests” of the foundation.
A think tank called The Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy, which describes itself on its website as a center “dedicated to the academic study of antisemitism,” sent a letter to U.S. officials in January alleging that Qatar had “substantial ownership” of weapons development rights and nuclear engineering research being developed at the Texas A&M campus, which they claim is a threat to national security. The letter came a few months after ISGAP released a 17-page report in which it alleged it had discovered a “disturbing relationship between Qatar and Texas A&M University.”
Texas A&M firmly denied the accusations about its research and also insisted the report from ISGAP was not a factor in the regents’ decision-making process. During the town hall Sunday, Welsh referred to the report as a “disinformation campaign” and said it had “no influence whatsoever on their decision.”
Yet many faculty say they want more answers from the regents about why they made this decision now, and so quickly.
“One has the feeling that [Welsh] is being given a job to enforce a decision he never would have made,” the faculty member in Qatar who spoke on the condition of anonymity said. “That’s the general feeling. That the regents were on a very different agenda from everyone else in the university system.”
Al-Sada said students are waiting for more answers, too. But, mainly, they want to know why they were treated as disposable.
“Whether or not we are in main campus College Station, or we are in Qatar, we are the same Aggies,” he said. “For it to be done to the very Aggies that Texas A&M are so proud of, it really felt like a slap in the face. We really did feel betrayed for the way the decision was made.”
The Texas Tribune partners with Open Campus on higher education coverage.
Disclosure: Northwestern University – Medill School of Journalism, Texas A&M University and Texas A&M University System have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/12/texas-am-qatar-closure-faculty/.
The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.
